CATS screening can feel confusing at first because the search results mix several similar names: the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen, CATS-2, caregiver reports, scoring sheets, and PDF forms for different ages. The central idea is simpler than the paperwork makes it look. CATS is a structured trauma screening tool for children and adolescents. It asks about potentially traumatic events, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and the way those symptoms may affect daily life. If you are trying to understand where a child or teen's score fits, this guide explains the common forms, how scoring is usually organized, and what a result should and should not mean. For a broader educational starting point, you can also explore a private online trauma screening resource designed for reflection, not labels.

The Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen is meant to organize information about trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress symptoms in young people. It is not a stand-alone clinical answer. Think of it as a structured conversation starter that helps a trained professional, caregiver, and child notice patterns that might otherwise be hard to describe.
Most CATS materials cover three broad areas:
That third piece matters. A symptom score without context can be misleading. A child may endorse a few symptoms after a frightening experience and still be recovering in a typical way. Another child may have a similar symptom count but be unable to sleep, attend school, or feel safe. Good CATS screening looks at the score, the child's story, caregiver observations, safety, timing, and support around the child.
Searchers often look for a CATS assessment PDF without realizing there are multiple versions. The right form depends mostly on the child's age and who is reporting.
For ages 7-17, CATS usually has a youth self-report version. A child or teen answers questions about what happened and how often symptoms have bothered them recently. This can be useful because older children may notice internal experiences that adults cannot see, such as intrusive memories, shame, avoidance, or feeling constantly alert.
For ages 7-17, there is also a caregiver report. A caregiver answers based on what they know and observe. This can add important context, especially for sleep, irritability, avoidance, school functioning, behavior changes, and family routines. When both youth and caregiver reports are available, they may not match perfectly. That difference is not automatically a problem. It can show where a young person is carrying distress quietly or where a caregiver is noticing effects the child has not named.
For ages 3-6, CATS caregiver materials are designed for younger children. Preschool children often cannot describe trauma symptoms in the same way older children can. Caregiver versions for this age range rely more on observed behavior, play, sleep, clinginess, fear, irritability, and changes in daily functioning.
CATS-2 is a newer version that includes scoring approaches connected with DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 PTSD or CPTSD frameworks. In plain language, CATS-2 tries to capture both posttraumatic stress symptoms and related patterns that can appear after ongoing or complex trauma. Because versions and scoring sheets can differ, it is important to match the form, age range, and scoring guide before interpreting a number.

CATS trauma screen scoring usually starts with exposure. If no potentially traumatic event is endorsed, the symptom section may not be interpreted in the same way. If at least one event is endorsed, the scoring process looks at symptom ratings and impairment.
For the original CATS 7-17 materials, the total PTSD symptom severity score is commonly calculated by adding the 20 symptom items. Each symptom is rated on a 0-3 scale, so the possible total range is 0-60. Official scoring guidance commonly uses these bands for ages 7-17:
| CATS 7-17 total symptom score | General meaning |
|---|---|
| Less than 15 | Not clinically elevated |
| 15-20 | Moderate trauma-related distress |
| 21 or higher | Positive screening threshold |
| 25 or higher | High trauma-related distress |
For caregiver CATS C 3-6 years materials, scoring is different because the preschool version uses fewer symptom items and age-specific PTSD criteria. A common total score range is 0-48, and a score of 16 or higher is often treated as a clinically relevant screening threshold for preschool children.
Categorical scoring looks beyond the total number. It asks whether enough symptoms are present in each cluster. In many CATS scoring sheets, only symptoms rated 2 or 3 are counted for the cluster rule. The categories often include:
CATS-2 scoring can add DSM-5 and ICD-11 pathways. Some CATS-2 forms include a DSM-5 total symptom score, an ICD-11 PTSD symptom intensity score, an ICD-11 CPTSD symptom intensity score, and categorical checks. This is why a CATS-2 assessment PDF and a CATS scoring sheet are not always interchangeable. If the form says CATS-2, use the matching CATS-2 scoring guide.

A CATS score can suggest that a child may be experiencing trauma-related distress. It can help a professional see whether symptoms are mild, moderate, elevated, or high. It can also help track whether symptoms are changing during care. That is useful, especially when a child has difficulty explaining what is happening internally.
But a score cannot tell the whole story. CATS screening relies on self-report or caregiver report. Children may underreport because they feel embarrassed, afraid, loyal to someone, confused, or tired of talking. Caregivers may underreport because they do not know what the child is experiencing internally. They may also over-notice certain behaviors while missing quieter symptoms.
This is why CATS results are best reviewed as part of a clinical conversation. A trained professional may ask follow-up questions about timing, safety, development, culture, family supports, school functioning, physical health, and whether symptoms are connected to a specific event or to ongoing stress. The screening result may point toward the need for trauma-focused support, but it should not be used to define a child on its own.
If you are a parent or caregiver, the most helpful response is often calm curiosity. You do not need to interrogate the child or solve everything in one conversation. You can notice changes, write down examples, ask gentle questions, and share concerns with a pediatrician, therapist, school counselor, or qualified mental health professional.
Before you rely on a CATS assessment PDF, pause for a few practical checks:
Families sometimes search for "CATS scoring sheet" because they want certainty. That is understandable. When a child is struggling, a number can feel like something solid. Still, trauma screening is most responsible when the number leads to better listening, better support, and a clearer next step.

CATS is designed for children and adolescents and is often used in clinical, school, research, or treatment settings. Online trauma tools serve a different role. They may help adults, caregivers, or older teens reflect on trauma-related experiences, learn vocabulary, or prepare for a professional conversation.
If you are exploring trauma questions more broadly, Trauma Test offers a free, private trauma test for self-reflection that can help organize your thoughts before speaking with a professional. It is educational and does not replace child-specific tools like CATS, CATS-2, or a clinician-guided child assessment.
For caregivers, the best use of online information is preparation. You might write down what changed, when it started, what helps, what makes things worse, and what the child says in their own words. That kind of observation often gives a professional more useful information than a score alone.

If a CATS screening result is elevated, the next step is not panic. It is support. A child may benefit from a fuller clinical evaluation, trauma-focused therapy, school coordination, family support, or safety planning, depending on the situation. Some children also improve with steady routines, emotionally safe relationships, and time, especially when symptoms are mild and functioning is intact.
If you are unsure where to begin, use the score as a conversation opener. You might say, "This screening suggests there may be trauma-related stress worth understanding better. What have you noticed, and what would help you feel safer talking about it?" That kind of language keeps the child at the center instead of making the score the center.
You can also review a private trauma screening overview to understand common trauma symptoms and prepare questions. Keep the focus on care, context, and connection. CATS screening is most useful when it helps adults listen more carefully and helps children feel less alone.
The Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen, or CATS, is a structured screening tool for potentially traumatic events and posttraumatic stress symptoms in children and adolescents. It includes trauma exposure items, symptom items, and questions about impairment in daily life.
No. CATS can identify possible trauma-related distress, but it should be reviewed with clinical judgment, follow-up questions, caregiver input when appropriate, and attention to safety and functioning. A screening score by itself should not be treated as the full clinical picture.
CATS is the earlier DSM-5 based version. CATS-2 is a newer version that includes scoring related to DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 PTSD or CPTSD frameworks. Because the forms differ, the scoring sheet should match the exact version being used.
For many CATS 7-17 scoring materials, a total symptom score of 21 or higher is used as a positive screening threshold, while 25 or higher suggests high trauma-related distress. Scores should be interpreted with impairment, age, context, and professional review.
The preschool caregiver form uses age-specific symptom criteria and a different total range than the 7-17 form. A score of 16 or higher is often used as a clinically relevant screening threshold, but the result should be reviewed with a qualified professional.
When the child is old enough, using both youth self-report and caregiver report can provide a fuller picture. The two reports may differ because children and caregivers notice different things. Those differences can guide better follow-up questions.
A high score is a reason to seek thoughtful support, not a reason to panic. Consider speaking with a pediatrician, therapist, school counselor, or qualified mental health professional who understands child trauma and can review safety, symptoms, functioning, and next steps.